United States v. Oliyinka Sobamowo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[cjontrary to defendants’ contentions, the tape replaying was not a stage of trial implicating the [Cjonfrontation [C]lause[,] ... Rule 43(a)[,]” or the Due Process Clause
• rejecting argument that “the government failed to investigate [the defendant] adequately before resorting to the wiretap”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).