United States v. Oliva, Robert R

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that defendant’s motion to suppress the grand jury testimony based upon the lack of a Schofield affidavit was misplaced, as such affidavits deal with the procedure to enforce the subpoena
• wherein Jackson claims that the evidence included images of him shooting a gun at the range, a “target used for firearm practice, digital images of [Jackson] and co-conspirators at the establishment, and a statement made by [Jackson] while at the establishment[.]”
• Schofield affidavit not required when subpoena not resisted.
• Schofield affidavit not required when subpoena not resisted.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).