United States v. Olander

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing how Congress could have decided to proscribe and punish receipt separately from possession in order “to deter those who receive child pornography from others and who thereby create demand and drive the market for child pornography”
• noting “receipt of child pornography, with or without an intent to distrib- 1 By prosecuting (and obtaining a guilty plea) for transporting child pornography, Tenuto’s distribution of the material remained available for the two-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2G2.2(b)(3)(F
• “If one receives child pornography, one necessarily possesses it, at least for a short time.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).