United States v. Olaf Peter Juda Raymond Edward Missell Anthony Burg Frans Gustaaf Van Der Hoeven and Christopher Dean Paris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that prior cases requiring a nexus involved situations where the United States sought to prosecute foreign nationals
• recognizing no distinction between the right to seize stateless vessels and the right to prosecute persons on board them
• “We have held, however, that when MDLEA jurisdiction is premised on consent of the flag nation, such consent relates back to activity that occurred prior to consent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).