Skip to main content
· 8/26/2013

United States v. Okatan

Citations

  • 728 F.3d 111
  • 2013 WL 4504587

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the prosecution was not permitted to use the driver’s prearrest invocation or his subsequent silence as part of “its case in chief as substantive evidence of guilt”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lynch, Lohier, Carney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.