United States v. Ohle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding sufficient effect when bank participated in scheme and thus incurred millions of dollars of losses in settlements and attorney’s fees
• severing indictment that charged defendant in connection with one scheme but did not allege that defendant had any knowledge of other charged schemes
• “The tolling provision is applicable even if the defendant is outside of the country for business or pleasure trips”
• “In using Bank A as a central player in the HOMER conspiracy, Ohle and his co-conspirator’s [sic] knew they were exposing it to risk if their fraud was uncovered.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).