United States v. Ohio Edison Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that Alabama Power made it “ascertainably certain that only de minimis activities would serve to trigger the routine maintenance exemption”
• noting that “it is beyond dispute that a regulation promulgated by an administrative agency is invalid to the extent the regulation conflicts with the language of a statute”
• finding unavailing defendant’s assertion that it lacked fair notice of the RMRR exemption

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).