· 8/10/1992
United States v. Ognian Bozarov
Citations
- 974 F.2d 1037
- 92 Daily Journal DAR 11123
- 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6934
- 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 18034
- 1992 WL 187634
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that criminal defendant’s inability to challenge administrative classification under export restriction statute did not violate due process because the validity of the classification was not an element of the offense
- rejecting claim that a congressional delegation of authority was unconstitutional because the agency's action was not subject to judicial review
- rejecting claim that a congressional delegation of authority was unconstitutional because the agency’s action was not subject to judicial review
- \We believe the EAA's finality clause permits review of agency actions that exceed statutory authority.\
- “We believe the EAA’s finality clause permits review of agency actions that exceed statutory authority.”
- “Bozorov has unquestionably been injured ... and invalidation of [the statute in question] will prevent him from being convicted. He therefore has standing to [raise a facial challenge].”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sneed, Nelson, Wanger
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.