Skip to main content
· 8/15/2003

United States v. O'Flanagan

Citations

  • 339 F.3d 1229
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 16764
  • 2003 WL 21949787

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a defendant could not assert an error under Apprendi v. New Jersey , because \his sentence does not exceed the statutory maximum\
  • holding that a defendant could not assert an error under Apprendi v. New Jersey , because \his sentence does not exceed the statutory maximum\
  • holding that a defendant could not assert an error under Apprendi v. New Jersey, because “his sentence does not exceed the statutory maximum”
  • presuming that Sentencing Commission approved of judicial interpretations of guidelines when making minor changes and failing to mention caselaw

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Briscoe, Kelly, Porfilio

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.