· 8/15/2003
United States v. O'Flanagan
Citations
- 339 F.3d 1229
- 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 16764
- 2003 WL 21949787
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a defendant could not assert an error under Apprendi v. New Jersey , because \his sentence does not exceed the statutory maximum\
- holding that a defendant could not assert an error under Apprendi v. New Jersey , because \his sentence does not exceed the statutory maximum\
- holding that a defendant could not assert an error under Apprendi v. New Jersey, because “his sentence does not exceed the statutory maximum”
- presuming that Sentencing Commission approved of judicial interpretations of guidelines when making minor changes and failing to mention caselaw
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Briscoe, Kelly, Porfilio
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.