United States v. O'Fallon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that appellate review is “not a vehicle to relitigate credibility arguments that were unpersuasive to a jury”
• recognizing that we must avoid “absurd consequences” in statutory construction
• noting that, where an amended rule utilized the same language as the rule in effect at the time the notice of appeal was filed, the amended rule is applied
• noting that, where an amended rule utilized the same language as the rule in effect at the time the notice of appeal was filed, the amended rule is applied
• noting that, where an amended rule utilized the same language as the rule in effect at the time the notice of appeal was filed, the amended rule is applied
• error cannot be “plain” where “there is no binding authority resolving” a legal question

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).