United States v. Odilon Garcia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, because “[a]iding and abetting is simply one means of committing a single crime,” it “does not matter whether some jurors found that [the defendant] performed these acts himself, and others that he intended to help someone else who did”
• reaffirming the principle that aiding and abetting is “implied in every federal indictment for a substantive offense”
• “Aiding and abetting is not a separate and distinct 7 offense from the underlying substantive crime, but is a different theory of liability for 8 the same offense.”
• \[A]iding and abetting is embedded in every federal indictment for a substantive crime.\
• \[A]iding and abetting is embedded in every federal indictment for a substantive crime.\
• \[A]iding and abetting is embedded in every federal indictment for a substantive crime.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).