United States v. Ochoa-Zarate

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Adding the ‘training qualification tended to make the question sound as though it asked for a response based on information broader than merely what the trooper had observed with his own eyes.”
• requiring a showing of “overwhelming probability” to rebut presumption that jury will follow instructions
• ‘‘[The witness has] at least taken responsibility for his own actions. As of today, this defendant still has not.’’ (Emphasis omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).