United States v. Ocamb

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Act “protects the Government from responding to others than [the original claimant], on her claim”
• holding that the Act “protects the Government from responding to others than [the original claimant], on her claim”
• holding that the Act “protects the Government from responding to others than [the original claimant], on her claim”
• stating that one of the three basic objectives of the Act is “to preserve for the Government defenses and counterclaims which might not be available against an assignee”
• stating that one of the three basic objectives of the Act is “to preserve for the Government defenses and counterclaims which might not be available against an assignee”
• stating that one of the three basic objectives of the Act is “to preserve for the Government defenses and counterclaims which might not be available against an assignee”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).