United States v. Obame

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding commercial success was evidenced in part by the patent owner entering into over fifteen licenses since the earlier negotiation11
• “The Court holds that the proper rate for the supplemental damages is the same rates the jury answered were applicable, which are 0.5% for monitors and 0.75% for televisions.”
• court conducted a full Georgia-Pacific analysis and had evidence of ongoing willful infringement
• “[T]he Court focuses on any new evidence that was not before the jury and additionally any changed circumstances ... between a hypothetical negotiation that occurred in 2005 (which the jury determined) and a hypothetical negotiation that would occur in 2011 after the judgment....”
• doubling the royalty rate by two times

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).