United States v. Nutri-Cology, Inc., D/B/A Allergy Research Group Biocurrents, Inc. Stephen A. Levine Susan D. Levine

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “the- passage of the statute is itself an implied finding by Congress that violations will harm the public”
• “A motion, however labelled [sic], served within ten days of the entry of an order that could have been brought under Rule 59(e) tolls the time for filing a notice of appeal.”
• timely Rule 59(e) motion tolls the time for appealing the underlying judgment
• “further inquiry into irreparable injury is unnecessary”
• applying prior 16 version of Rule 59(e)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).