Skip to main content
· 3/19/2013

United States v. Nueci-Pena

Citations

  • 711 F.3d 191
  • 2013 WL 1110862

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting party’s argument that de novo review applied to argument not raised in the district court
  • reviewing for plain error although the government “erroneously assert[ed] that de novo review applied]”
  • reviewing for plain error although the government “erroneously assert[ed] that de novo review applie[d]”
  • affirming constitutionality of MDLEA under Piracies and Felonies Clause on plain-error review
  • reviewing Define and Punish Clause challenge for plain error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Howard, Lipez, Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.