· 3/19/2013
United States v. Nueci-Pena
Citations
- 711 F.3d 191
- 2013 WL 1110862
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting party’s argument that de novo review applied to argument not raised in the district court
- reviewing for plain error although the government “erroneously assert[ed] that de novo review applied]”
- reviewing for plain error although the government “erroneously assert[ed] that de novo review applie[d]”
- affirming constitutionality of MDLEA under Piracies and Felonies Clause on plain-error review
- reviewing Define and Punish Clause challenge for plain error
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Howard, Lipez, Thompson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.