United States v. Nova Scotia Food Products Corp., David Sklar and Emanuel Sklar, and National Fisheries Institute, Intervenor-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[i]t is not in keeping with the rational [agency] process to leave vital questions, raised by comments which are of cogent materiality, completely unanswered”
• “In an enforcement action, we must rely exclusively on the record made before the agency to determine the validity of the regulation.”
• “concise general statement” required by APA section 553(c) is inadequate when material comments are left completely unanswered
• “Though this alternative was suggested by an agency of the federal government, its suggestion, though acknowledged, was never answered” (emphasis added)
• application of fish-processing rule inadequately justified as to one species of fish
• application of fish-processing rule inadequately justified as to one species of fish

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).