United States v. Norman Washington Stultz, Also Known as Norman Stulze, Also Known as Norman Stultze, Also Known as Peter Myree

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that the Protect Act ... requires [courts of appeals] to review departures from the Guidelines de novo
• finding that “the clause referring to dates of conviction was unnecessary with respect to drug trafficking crimes, and such omission is not an invitation to consider the period of time between offenses as grounds for departure”
• finding that “the clause referring to dates of conviction was unnecessary with respect to drug trafficking crimes, and such omission is not an invitation to consider the period of time between offenses as grounds for departure”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).