Skip to main content
· 8/29/1995

United States v. Norland

Citations

  • 897 F. Supp. 476
  • 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13782
  • 1995 WL 555274

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • warning that failure to send a representative with settlement authority exhibits “a lack of good faith, and could warrant sanctions under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f)”
  • finding that failing to send a representative with settlement authority exhibits “a lack of good faith, and could warrant sanctions under FED. R. CIV. P. 16(f)”
  • finding that failing to send a representative with settlement authority exhibits “a lack of good faith, and could warrant sanctions under FED. R. CIV. P. 16(f)”
  • finding that failing to send a representative with settlement authority exhibits “a lack of good faith, and could warrant sanctions under FED. R. CIV. P. 16(f)”
  • finding that failing to send a representative with settlement authority exhibits “a lack of good faith, and could warrant sanctions under FED. R. CIV. P. 16(f)”
  • Court reluctant to impose sanctions when party not alerted it would be subject to sanctions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.