United States v. Noel Hernandez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that because forfeiture was authorized under 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), and “the government included notice of the forfeiture in [the defendant’s] indictment, the district court was required by § 2461(c
• explaining that because forfeiture was authorized under 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), and “the government included notice of the forfeiture in [the defendant’s] indictment, the district court was required by § 2461(c
• hold- ing that the district court erred in denying the government’s forfei- ture motion in prosecution for a violation of § 641
• per 22 Case: 18-10232 Date Filed: 01/24/2020 Page: 23 of 23 curiam
• discussing the mandatory nature of 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).