Skip to main content
· 8/9/2006

United States v. Noe Lopez-Vargas

Citations

  • 457 F.3d 828
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 20353
  • 2006 WL 2265565

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no clear error in the district court’s determination that a defendant’s consent identifying one location permitted a subsequent search at a second location

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wollman, Hansen, Benton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.