United States v. Ning Wen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no conflict with the Fourth Amendment where evidence obtained pursuant to a FISA court order was used in a criminal prosecution
• “Interception of [the defendant’s] conversations was adequately justified under FISA’s terms, so there is no constitutional obstacle to using evidence of any domestic crimes he committed.”
• “[T]he ‘probable cause’ of which the fourth amendment speaks is not necessarily probable cause to believe that any law is being violated---- Probable cause to believe that a foreign agent is communicating with his controllers outside our borders makes an interception reasonable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).