Skip to main content
· 3/14/1990

United States v. Ninety One Thousand Nine Hundred Sixty Dollars ($91,960.00), Luis Mario Rosario

Citations

  • 897 F.2d 1457
  • 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 3725
  • 1990 WL 26463

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the possession of a large sum of money is evidence of probable cause for forfeiture
  • finding that the possession of a large sum of money is evidence of probable cause for forfeiture
  • finding that inconsistent statements concerning the presence of money are evidence of probable cause for forfeiture
  • finding that inconsistent statements concerning the presence of money are evidence of probable cause for forfeiture
  • finding that a positive dog sniff is evidence of probable cause for forfeiture
  • finding that a positive dog sniff is evidence of probable cause for forfeiture

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fagg, Heaney, Bright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.