United States v. Nihols

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[Cjourts typically exercise some degree of leniency toward pro se litigants who lack formal legal training!.]”
• “The language ... is clear and unambiguous; therefore, we will follow [its] plain meaning” (collecting cases)
• “Absent indicia that, at the time the contract was executed, the parties assigned a specialized meaning to an otherwise common term, we will not alter its accepted usage.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).