United States v. Nigel D. Ince

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a vague curative instruction failed to remedy erroneously admitting a highly prejudicial confession
• declaring that when determining whether impeachment evidence is admissible or a \mere subterfuge\ to get before the jury substantive evidence which is otherwise inadmissible hearsay, a court must apply Rule 403
• evaluating the effect of the evidence of the defendant’s coerced confession
• cautioning against prosecution's impeachment of its own witness with prior inconsistent statement
• “[W]e recognize the presumption of cure by a court’s instruction .... ”
• \[W]e recognize the presumption of cure by a court’s instruction . . . .\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).