United States v. Ngige

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \The problem with [the defendant's] argument is that it fails to attack the facial validity of the indictment and instead challenges the government's substantive case.\
• discussing the requirements of a conspiracy generally

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).