· 2/4/1952
United States v. New Wrinkle, Inc.
Citations
- 342 U.S. 371
- 72 S. Ct. 350
- 96 L. Ed. 2d 417
- 1952 U.S. LEXIS 2811
- 96 L. Ed. 417
- 92 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 158
- 1952 Trade Cas. (CCH) 67,214
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- invalidating a scheme in which multiple patent holders “pool[ed] their patents” to “fix prices on . . . products for themselves and their licensees”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reed, Clark
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.