United States v. Neufeld-Neufeld

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that in deciding to make an investigative stop, agent with one and one-half years of experience benefited from partner agent’s thirteen years of experience
• concluding that in deciding to make an investigative stop, agent with one and one-half years of experience benefited from partner agent’s thirteen years of experience
• explaining that reasonable suspicion is “something more than an ‘inchoate and unparticularized suspicion or hunch’”
• according weight to the defendant’s considerable deceleration after seeing the marked patrol car, and the defendant did not appear to be speeding beforehand
• determining reasonable suspicion existed for stop on U.S. Highway 385 in Big Bend National Park in part because the driver “stared straight ahead” and “failed to acknowledge [the agent]”
• “[W]e must view all the facts as a collective whole in light of the context and the Agent[’s] experience.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).