United States v. Nemorio Guzman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting the “well-established presumption of juror impartiality . . . as well as the equally important presumption that jurors followed the trial court’s instructions”
• noting the “well- established presumption of juror impartiality . . . as well as the equally important presumption that jurors followed the trial court’s instructions” (citations omitted)
• district court asked jurors who heard general comments about others’ experiences with the criminal justice system if they could be impartial and all answered affirmatively
• “Therefore, trial courts would need to conduct the entire process in 28 camera to prevent the risk of complete venire contamination from innocent, extraneous remarks. . . . Entirely in camera voir dire would only lengthen the process-without any corresponding benefit.”
• “We begin with the well-established presumption of juror impartiality.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).