United States v. Nemencio Canales, Benito Canales, Eduardo Vasquez 1 and Juan Torres-Alaniz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The evaluation of a claim of variance, therefore, involves application of a two-step analysis: first, to ascertain whether there was in fact a variance between indictment and proof, and second, to determine whether the variance was prejudicial.” (emphasis added

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).