United States v. Nelida Rodriguez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a defendant’s failure to object to a factual statement in the PSR constitutes an admission of those facts
• explaining that, when we review district judges’ “extemporaneous spoken words of explanation,” we don’t “as- sume that the district judges do not know the law” (quotation omitted)
• “In addition, proper calculation of the guidelines requires consideration of all relevant conduct, not merely charged conduct.” (quotations omitted)
• not- ing that “not every delay . . . , even an inordinate one, violates due process”
• “We review for plain error when a defendant . . . fails to object in the district court to a claimed Rule 11 violation, including a claim that there was an insufficient factual basis for a guilty plea.”
• same, for Rule 11(b)(1)(D) error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).