United States v. Neering

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a deputy magistrate not properly appointed to the position lacked authority to issue a warrant, rendering it void
• holding that a deputy magistrate not properly appointed to the position lacked authority to issue a warrant, rendering it void
• holding that a deputy magistrate who was not lawfully appointed lacked authority to issue warrants and that the search warrant was void as a matter of law
• suppression of evidence pursuant to a warrant that was void ab initio because the magistrate's appointment had not been properly completed
• “The Court concludes, therefore, that [the magistrate]’s lack of authority to issue the search warrant in this case rendered it void.”
• warrant issued by an official who was not properly appointed and therefore lacked issuing authority was void, and under Scott, the good-faith exception did not apply

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).