Skip to main content
· 1/28/1920

United States v. Nederlandsch-Amerikaansche Stoomvart Maatschappij (Holland-American Line)

Citations

  • 254 U.S. 148

Syllabus

<p>A foreign steamship company alleged that, under duress practiced by the immigration authorities, it paid bills rendered by them under color of the Immigration Act, for maintenance and medical care . furnished by the United States to certain immigrants who, after landing from the company’s ships, were temporarily detained before being admitted to the country, and it claimed reimbursement under the Tucker Act, upon the ground that the exactions were in violation of its rights as an alien subject, secured by the Constitution, treaties and laws of the United States. Held, that the claim, being founded on alleged torts of federal officials, was not within the Tucker Act or the jurisdiction of the Court of Claims. P. 155.</p> <p>53 Ct. Clms. 522, reversed.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • unauthorized coercion of payments by governmental agents is tortious
  • unauthorized coercion of payments by governmental agents is tortious
  • unauthorized coercion of payments by governmental agents is tortious

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Day

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.