United States v. Nealy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding it “significant that at all relevant times during [a]ppellant’s proceedings, Article 117, UCMJ, ‘provoking speech,’ was listed in the MCM as an LIO of Article 134, UCMJ, communicating a threat.”
• finding “the entire record suggests that everyone involved in the case believed that the Article 117, UCMJ, offense was in fact an LIO of the Article 134, UCMJ, offense . . . .”
• “[W]hen a convening authority refers a charge to a court-martial, any [lesser included offenses] of that charge are referred with it, and need not be separately charged and referred.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named United States v. Nealy

8 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• United States v. Nealy
  Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2011-08-15· cited 2×
• United States v. Nealy
  Fifth Circuit· 1992-02-11
• United States v. Nealy
  Fifth Circuit· 1993-08-06
• United States v. Nealy
  Fifth Circuit· 1993-09-23
• United States v. Nealy
  Fifth Circuit· 1994-06-17
• United States v. Nealy
  Fifth Circuit· 1994-09-22
• United States v. Nealy
  Eleventh Circuit· 1998-11-04
• United States v. Nealy
  Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2011-09-08