Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 3/30/2012

United States v. Nealy

Citations

71 M.J. 73
2012 CAAF LEXIS 369
2012 WL 1108134

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding it “significant that at all relevant times during [a]ppellant’s proceedings, Article 117, UCMJ, ‘provoking speech,’ was listed in the MCM as an LIO of Article 134, UCMJ, communicating a threat.”
finding “the entire record suggests that everyone involved in the case believed that the Article 117, UCMJ, offense was in fact an LIO of the Article 134, UCMJ, offense . . . .”
“[W]hen a convening authority refers a charge to a court-martial, any [lesser included offenses] of that charge are referred with it, and need not be separately charged and referred.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baker, Effron, Erdmann, Ryan, Stucky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named United States v. Nealy

8 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.