United States v. Naylon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• While the court does not “serve as a ‘super correction board[,]’ Skinner v. United States,...correction boards must examine relevant data and articulate satisfactory explanations for their decisions.”
• “When substantial evidence supports a board’s action, and when that action is reasonable in light of all the evidence presented, the court will not disturb the result.” (internal citations omitted)
• While the court does not “serve as a ‘super correction board[,]’ Skinner v. United States, . . . correction boards must examine relevant data and articulate satisfactory explanations for their decisions.”
• While the court does not “serve as a ‘super correction board[,]’ Skinner v. United States, . . . correction boards must examine relevant data and articulate satisfactory explanations for their decisions.”
• While the court does not “serve as a ‘super correction board[,]’ Skinner v. United States, . . . correction boards must examine relevant data and articulate satisfactory explanations for their decisions.”
• While the court does not “serve as a ‘super correction board[,]’ Skinner v. United States, [219 Ct.Cl. at 331, 594 F.2d 824] ... correction boards must examine relevant data and articulate satisfactory explanations for their decisions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).