United States v. Nauss

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that arbitrators are only charged with having knowledge of governing law identified by the parties
• explaining that the arbitrator must either knowingly “refuse[ ] to apply” or “intentionally disregard[ ]” governing law
• explaining that the arbitrator must either knowingly “refuse[ ] to apply” or “intentionally disregard[ ]” governing law
• noting that the petitioner only informed the arbitrator that “he was ‘entitled to’ attorney’s fees under the ADEA”
• noting that “[tjhe arbitrators obviously knew that DiRussa was requesting attorney’s fees under the ADEA (and NJLAD
• finding plaintiff had not explained to the arbitrators that attorney’s fees were mandated under the statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).