· 6/9/1961
United States v. Naughten
Citations
- 195 F. Supp. 157
- 1961 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2787
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “[t]here is no presumption” in the Reform Act “that co-lead plaintiffs are better than one lead plaintiff”
- noting that “[t]here is no presumption” in the Reform Act “that co-lead plaintiffs are better than one lead plaintiff”
- consolidation appropriate even though one complaint asserted claims against additional defendants and contained “slightly different facts and legal claims”
- consolidation appropriate even though one complaint asserted claims against additional defendants and contained “slightly different facts and legal claims”
- consolidation appropriate even though one complaint asserted claims against additional defendants and contained “slightly different facts and legal claims”
- “This court, like many others, shall place the most emphasis on the last of the four factors: the approximate loss suffered by the movant.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Halbert
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.