Skip to main content
· 6/9/1961

United States v. Naughten

Citations

  • 195 F. Supp. 157
  • 1961 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2787

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “[t]here is no presumption” in the Reform Act “that co-lead plaintiffs are better than one lead plaintiff”
  • noting that “[t]here is no presumption” in the Reform Act “that co-lead plaintiffs are better than one lead plaintiff”
  • consolidation appropriate even though one complaint asserted claims against additional defendants and contained “slightly different facts and legal claims”
  • consolidation appropriate even though one complaint asserted claims against additional defendants and contained “slightly different facts and legal claims”
  • consolidation appropriate even though one complaint asserted claims against additional defendants and contained “slightly different facts and legal claims”
  • “This court, like many others, shall place the most emphasis on the last of the four factors: the approximate loss suffered by the movant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Halbert

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.