United States v. Nathaniel Worden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying on United States v. Blinn, 490 F.3d 586, 587–88 (7th Cir. 2007) (“We will enforce a plea agreement’s appellate waiver if its terms are clear and unambiguous and the record shows that the defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered into the agreement.”
• “Because restitution is part of a criminal sentence, and [the defendant] agreed not to challenge the sen- tence, he may not appeal the restitution order.”
• “Because restitution is a part of a crim- inal sentence, and Worden agreed not to challenge his sen- tence, he may not appeal the restitution order.”
• “Because restitution is a part of a crim- inal sentence, and Worden agreed not to challenge his sen- tence, he may not appeal the restitution order.”
• “We will enforce a plea agreement’s appellate waiver if its terms are clear and unambiguous and the record shows that the defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered into the agreement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).