· 3/26/2013
United States v. Nathaniel Benjamin
Citations
- 711 F.3d 371
- 2013 WL 1197767
- 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 5996
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- considering the jurisprudence of other federal appellate courts as part of prong two of plain-error review
- “Although the continuing nature of the conduct criminalized by the . . . statute is a matter of first impression for this Court, we hold that the District Court's error was plain.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith, Chagares, Garth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.