Skip to main content
· 3/26/2013

United States v. Nathaniel Benjamin

Citations

  • 711 F.3d 371
  • 2013 WL 1197767
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 5996

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering the jurisprudence of other federal appellate courts as part of prong two of plain-error review
  • “Although the continuing nature of the conduct criminalized by the . . . statute is a matter of first impression for this Court, we hold that the District Court's error was plain.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Chagares, Garth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.