United States v. Nathan W. Shavin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that, in a close question of whether the defendant acted with fraudulent intent or in good faith, it was error for the district court to refuse to allow the defendant to introduce evidence of other legitimate business transactions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).