· 6/12/1940
United States v. Nathan Kaufman Co.
Citations
- 4 Cust. Ct. 872
- 1940 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 4131
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The express words of § 1319(g)(6)’s bar provision appear to have been chosen with care. I can find no reason to abrogate them.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tilson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.