United States v. Nathan Dotz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that motions for reconsideration of a sentence, “regardless of creative characterization,” do not suspend the time for filing an appeal because “there is simply no such thing as a ‘motion to reconsider’ an otherwise final sentence”
• rejecting defendant’s “creative characterization” of his Rule 35(a) motion as a motion for reconsideration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).