United States v. Nancy K. Bistrup, United States of America v. Alan K. Bistrup

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering the testimony of bank representatives that the disclosure of withheld information would have affected lending decisions in finding sufficient evidence of material misrepresentation
• noting the complexities involved in perpetuating a fraudulent investment scheme over five years through repeated lies and money-shifting
• the sentencing court need not \repeat all of its findings when it decides on a specific term of imprisonment\
• “Given the extent of the fraudulent scheme, [and] the coordination and planning needed to maintain the scheme for almost five years, ... the district court did not err in enhancing [the] sentence for use of sophisticated means.”
• unpreserved objection to district court’s explanation reviewed for plain error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).