Skip to main content
· 9/13/1995

United States v. Nancy Gertner, Etc., John Doe, Intervenor

Citations

  • 65 F.3d 963
  • 76 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6325
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 25960
  • 1995 WL 529336

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding finding that administrative agency’s sole purpose for summons was to gain information about lawyer’s unnamed client and that stated purpose for issuing the summons was merely a pretext for its real purpose
  • the district court “act[s] as a surrogate for the unnamed taxpayer . . . to ‘exert[] a restraining influence on the 23 IRS”
  • “[W]e regularly turn a deaf ear to protests that an evidentiary hearing should have been convened but was not, where, as here, the protestor did not seasonably request such a hearing in the lower court.”
  • “This burden is not taxing, so to speak.”
  • out-of-circuit analysis of legitimate purpose

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Selya, Boudin, Lisi

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.