United States v. Nagesh Shetty

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the district court satisfied the Speedy Trial Act by citing “undisputed facts to support each continuance at issue”
• reversal of conviction on speedy trial grounds not warranted where defendant stipu- UNITED STATES v. KING 4393 lated to continuances
• “Each continuance at issue in Shetty's case was specifically supported by the district court's reference to facts, which were stipulated by the parties, and which buttressed each of its findings of excludable time under the Speedy Trial Act.”
• “[I]n a tax case, money is material evidence.” (alteration in original) (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).