United States v. Nagell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We review a district court’s denial of a motion to withdraw a guilty plea for abuse of discretion.” (citation omitted)
• “[S]olemn declarations in open court carry a strong presumption of verity.” (alteration in original) (citation omitted)
• “[T]hree months between the entering of a guilty plea and the filing of a motion to withdraw constitutes a significant delay that weighs against granting withdrawal.”
• “[Defendant] argues on appeal that the government has failed to show how it would be prejudiced by withdrawal of [his] plea, but he does not directly refute the government’s assertions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).