United States v. Mystic Fuel, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that \[a]llegations of negligence or innocent mistake are insufficient\ to rebut probable cause for a warrant (citation omitted)
• stating that “North Carolina courts are not required to respect Virginia’s claim of sovereign immunity, [but] may do so as a matter of comity” (quotation marks and citation omitted)
• applying standard used to challenge probable cause for a warrant to a civil case where no affidavit is mentioned
• rejecting “gross negligence” claim where plaintiff was unable to show, police lacked probable cause for arrest and prosecution
• “As North Carolina extends sovereign immunity to its own public universities .... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).