Skip to main content
· 7/19/2000

United States v. Myris Matthews

Citations

  • 222 F.3d 305
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 17313
  • 2000 WL 994188

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • district court’s choice between two permissible views of evidence was not clearly erroneous

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cudahy, Flaum, Manton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.