United States v. Myler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the Supreme Court may address an issue that is likely to recur on remand in order to provide guidance to the Superior Court
• noting that, on remand, prior evidentiary rulings decided under the Uniform Rules of Evidence should be reconsidered in light of the subsequent adoption of the Federal Rules of Evidence
• holding a lack of physical evidence does not render guilty verdict insufficient
• declining to review sufficiency of evidence for voluntary manslaughter when evidence sufficient to establish first-degree murder
• declining to review sufficiency argument when defendant takes opposite position on appeal from that taken at trial
• noting the question, but not resolving it, because the trial court had applied the Uniform Rules of Evidence instead of the Federal Rules

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).