United States v. M/V Wuerttemberg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \The Connecticut Supreme Court has used the terms 'in issue' and 'at issue' interchangeably when discussing the implied-waiver-of-privilege doctrine....\
• “The Connecticut Su- preme Court has used the terms ‘in issue’ and ‘at issue’ in- terchangeably when discussing the implied-waiver-of- privilege doctrine . . . .”
• complainant’s allegation of mental distress, ‘‘which [was] unaccompanied by any independent cause of action for mental distress . . . or claim for a specific mental disorder or condition,’’ was claim for garden- variety emotional distress

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).